Gonadal steroid hormones are the principal drivers of sex-variable biology in vertebrates. In the brain, estrogen (17β-estradiol) establishes neural sex differences in many species and modulates mood, behavior, and energy balance in adulthood. To understand the diverse effects of estradiol on the brain, we profiled the genomic binding of estrogen receptor alpha (ERα), providing the first picture of the neural actions of any gonadal hormone receptor. To relate ERα target genes to brain sex differences we assessed gene expression and chromatin accessibility in the posterior bed nucleus of the stria terminalis (BNSTp), a sexually dimorphic node in limbic circuitry that underlies sex-differential social behaviors such as aggression and parenting. In adult animals we observe that levels of ERα are predictive of the extent of sex-variable gene expression, and that these sex differences are a dynamic readout of acute hormonal state. In neonates we find that transient ERα recruitment at birth leads to persistent chromatin opening and male-biased gene expression, demonstrating a true epigenetic mechanism for brain sexual differentiation. Collectively, our findings demonstrate that sex differences in gene expression in the brain are a readout of state-dependent hormone receptor actions, rather than other factors such as sex chromosomes. We anticipate that the ERα targets we have found will contribute to established sex differences in the incidence and etiology of neurological and psychiatric disorders.

Understanding the brain is not only intrinsically fascinating, but also highly relevant to increase our well-being since our brain exhibits a power over the body that makes it capable both of provoking illness or facilitating the healing process. Bearing in mind this dark force, brain sciences have undergone and will undergo an important revolution, redefining its boundaries beyond the cranial cavity. During this presentation, we will discuss about the communication between the brain and other systems that shapes how we feel the external word and how we think. We are starting to unravel how our organs talk to the brain and how the brain talks back. That two-way communication encompasses a complex, body-wide system of nerves, hormones and other signals that will be discussed. This presentation aims at challenging a long history of thinking of bodily regulation as separate from "higher" mental processes. Four centuries ago, René Descartes famously conceptualized the mind as being separate from the body, it is time now to embody our mind.

Rhythmic changes in sex hormone levels across the ovarian cycle exert powerful effects on the brain and behavior, and confer female-specific risks for neuropsychiatric conditions. In this talk, Dr. Kundakovic will discuss the role of fluctuating ovarian hormones as a critical biological factor contributing to the increased depression and anxiety risk in women. Cycling ovarian hormones drive brain and behavioral plasticity in both humans and rodents, and the talk will focus on animal studies in Dr. Kundakovic’s lab that are revealing the molecular and receptor mechanisms that underlie this female-specific brain dynamic. She will highlight the lab’s discovery of sex hormone-driven epigenetic mechanisms, namely chromatin accessibility and 3D genome changes, that dynamically regulate neuronal gene expression and brain plasticity but may also prime the (epi)genome for psychopathology. She will then describe functional studies, including hormone replacement experiments and the overexpression of an estrous cycle stage-dependent transcription factor, which provide the causal link(s) between hormone-driven chromatin dynamics and sex-specific anxiety behavior. Dr. Kundakovic will also highlight an unconventional role that chromatin dynamics may have in regulating neuronal function across the ovarian cycle, including in sex hormone-driven X chromosome plasticity and hormonally-induced epigenetic priming. In summary, these studies provide a molecular framework to understand ovarian hormone-driven brain plasticity and increased female risk for anxiety and depression, opening new avenues for sex- and gender-informed treatments for brain disorders.

Sex hormones are powerful neuromodulators of learning and memory. In rodents and nonhuman primates estrogen and progesterone influence the central nervous system across a range of spatiotemporal scales. Yet, their influence on the structural and functional architecture of the human brain is largely unknown. Here, I highlight findings from a series of dense-sampling neuroimaging studies from my laboratory designed to probe the dynamic interplay between the nervous and endocrine systems. Individuals underwent brain imaging and venipuncture every 12-24 hours for 30 consecutive days. These procedures were carried out under freely cycling conditions and again under a pharmacological regimen that chronically suppresses sex hormone production. First, resting state fMRI evidence suggests that transient increases in estrogen drive robust increases in functional connectivity across the brain. Time-lagged methods from dynamical systems analysis further reveals that these transient changes in estrogen enhance within-network integration (i.e. global efficiency) in several large-scale brain networks, particularly Default Mode and Dorsal Attention Networks. Next, using high-resolution hippocampal subfield imaging, we found that intrinsic hormone fluctuations and exogenous hormone manipulations can rapidly and dynamically shape medial temporal lobe morphology. Together, these findings suggest that neuroendocrine factors influence the brain over short and protracted timescales.

Many animals live in complex social groups. To survive, it is essential to know who to avoid and who to interact. Although naïve mice are naturally attracted to any adult conspecifics, a single defeat experience could elicit social avoidance towards the aggressor for days. The neural mechanisms underlying the behavior switch from social approach to social avoidance remains incompletely understood. Here, we identify oxytocin neurons in the retrochiasmatic supraoptic nucleus (SOROXT) and oxytocin receptor (OXTR) expressing cells in the anterior subdivision of ventromedial hypothalamus, ventrolateral part (aVMHvlOXTR) as a key circuit motif for defeat-induced social avoidance learning. After defeat, aVMHvlOXTR cells drastically increase their responses to aggressor cues. This response change is functionally important as optogenetic activation of aVMHvlOXTR cells elicits time-locked social avoidance towards a benign social target whereas inactivating the cells suppresses defeat-induced social avoidance. Furthermore, OXTR in the aVMHvl is itself essential for the behavior change. Knocking out OXTR in the aVMHvl or antagonizing the receptor during defeat, but not during post-defeat social interaction, impairs defeat-induced social avoidance. aVMHvlOXTR receives its private supply of oxytocin from SOROXT cells. SOROXT is highly activated by the noxious somatosensory inputs associated with defeat. Oxytocin released from SOROXT depolarizes aVMHvlOXTR cells and facilitates their synaptic potentiation, and hence, increases aVMHvlOXTR cell responses to aggressor cues. Ablating SOROXT cells impairs defeat-induced social avoidance learning whereas activating the cells promotes social avoidance after a subthreshold defeat experience. Altogether, our study reveals an essential role of SOROXT-aVMHvlOXTR circuit in defeat-induced social learning and highlights the importance of hypothalamic oxytocin system in social ranking and its plasticity.

The impact of apolipoprotein E ε4 (APOE4), the strongest genetic risk factor for Alzheimer’s disease (AD), on human brain cellular function remains unclear. Here, we investigated the effects of APOE4 on brain cell types derived from population and isogenic human induced pluripotent stem cells, post-mortem brain, and APOE targeted replacement mice. Population and isogenic models demonstrate that APOE4 local haplotype, rather than a single risk allele, contributes to risk. Global transcriptomic analyses reveal human-specific, APOE4-driven lipid metabolic dysregulation in astrocytes and microglia. APOE4 enhances de novo cholesterol synthesis despite elevated intracellular cholesterol due to lysosomal cholesterol sequestration in astrocytes. Further, matrisome dysregulation is associated with upregulated chemotaxis, glial activation, and lipid biosynthesis in astrocytes co-cultured with neurons, which recapitulates altered astrocyte matrisome signaling in human brain. Thus, APOE4 initiates glia-specific cell and non-cell autonomous dysregulation that may contribute to increased AD risk." https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2022.05.017

The hypothalamus controls diverse homeostatic functions including fertility. Neural episode generators are required to drive the intermittent pulsatile and surge profiles of reproductive hormone secretion that control gonadal function. Studies in genetic mouse models have been fundamental in defining the neural circuits forming these central pattern generators and the full range of in vitro and in vivo optogenetic and chemogenetic methodologies have enabled investigation into their mechanism of action. The seminar will outline studies defining the hypothalamic “GnRH pulse generator network” and current understanding of its operation to drive pulsatile hormone secretion.

The circadian release of endogenous glucocorticoids is essential in preparing and synchronizing the body’s daily physiological needs. Disruption in the rhythmic activity of glucocorticoids has been observed in individuals with a variety of cancer types, and blunting of this rhythm has been shown to predict cancer mortality and declines in quality of life. This suggests that a disrupted glucocorticoid rhythm is potentially a shared phenotype across cancers. However, where this phenomenon is driven by the cancer itself, and the causal mechanisms that link glucocorticoid rhythm dysfunction and cancer outcomes remain preliminary at best. The regulation of daily glucocorticoid activity has been well-characterized and is maintained, in part, by the coordinated response of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis, consisting of the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) and corticotropin-releasing hormone-expressing neurons of the paraventricular nucleus of the hypothalamus (PVNCRH). Consequently, we set out to examine if cancer-induced glucocorticoid dysfunction is regulated by disruptions within these hypothalamic nuclei. In comparison to their tumor-free baseline, mammary tumor-bearing mice exhibited a blunting of glucocorticoid rhythms across multiple timepoints throughout the day, as measured by the overall levels and the slope of fecal corticosterone rhythms, during tumor progression. We further examined how peripheral tumors shape hypothalamic activity within the brain. Serial two-photon tomography for whole-brain cFos imaging suggests a disrupted activation of the PVN in mice with tumors. Additionally, we found GFP labeled CRH+ neurons within the PVN after injection of pseudorabies virus expressing GFP into the tumor, pointing to the PVN as a primary target disrupted by mammary tumors. Preliminary in vivo fiber photometry data show that PVNCRH neurons exhibit enhanced calcium activity during tumor progression, as compared to baseline (no tumor) activity. Taken together, this suggests that there may be an overactive HPA response during tumor progression, which in turn, may result in a subsequent negative feedback on glucocorticoid rhythms. Current studies are examining whether tumor progression modulates SCN calcium activity, how the transcriptional profile of PVNCRH neurons is changed, and test if manipulation of the neurocircuitry surrounding glucocorticoid rhythmicity alters tumor characteristics.

Understanding the brain is not only intrinsically fascinating, but also highly relevant to increase our well-being since our brain exhibits a power over the body that makes it capable both of provoking illness or facilitating the healing process. Bearing in mind this dark force, brain sciences have undergone and will undergo an important revolution, redefining its boundaries beyond the cranial cavity. During this presentation, we will discuss about the communication between the brain and other systems that shapes how we feel the external word and how we think. We are starting to unravel how our organs talk to the brain and how the brain talks back. That two-way communication encompasses a complex, bodywide system of nerves, hormones and other signals that we will discussed. This presentation aims at challenging a long history of thinking of bodily regulation as separate from "higher" mental processes. Four centuries ago, René Descartes famously conceptualized the mind as being separate from the body, it is time now to embody our mind.

The taste system detects 5 major categories of ethologically relevant stimuli (sweet, bitter, umami, sour and salt) and accordingly elicits acceptance or avoidance responses. While these taste responses are innate, the taste system retains a remarkable flexibility in response to changing external and internal contexts. Taste chemicals are first recognized by dedicated taste receptor cells (TRCs) and then transmitted to the cortex via a multi-station relay. I reasoned that if I could identify taste neural substrates along this pathway, it would provide an entry to decipher how taste signals are encoded to drive innate response and modulated to facilitate adaptive response. Given the innate nature of taste responses, these neural substrates should be genetically identifiable. I therefore exploited single-cell RNA sequencing to isolate molecular markers defining taste qualities in the taste ganglion and the nucleus of the solitary tract (NST) in the brainstem, the two stations transmitting taste signals from TRCs to the brain. How taste information propagates from the ganglion to the brain is highly debated (i.e., does taste information travel in labeled-lines?). Leveraging these genetic handles, I demonstrated one-to-one correspondence between ganglion and NST neurons coding for the same taste. Importantly, inactivating one ‘line’ did not affect responses to any other taste stimuli. These results clearly showed that taste information is transmitted to the brain via labeled lines. But are these labeled lines aptly adapted to the internal state and external environment? I studied the modulation of taste signals by conflicting taste qualities in the concurrence of sweet and bitter to understand how adaptive taste responses emerge from hardwired taste circuits. Using functional imaging, anatomical tracing and circuit mapping, I found that bitter signals suppress sweet signals in the NST via top-down modulation by taste cortex and amygdala of NST taste signals. While the bitter cortical field provides direct feedback onto the NST to amplify incoming bitter signals, it exerts negative feedback via amygdala onto the incoming sweet signal in the NST. By manipulating this feedback circuit, I showed that this top-down control is functionally required for bitter evoked suppression of sweet taste. These results illustrate how the taste system uses dedicated feedback lines to finely regulate innate behavioral responses and may have implications for the context-dependent modulation of hardwired circuits in general.

Information processing is energetically expensive. In the mammalian brain, it is unclear how information coding and energy usage are regulated during food scarcity. I addressed this in the visual cortex of awake mice using whole-cell recordings and two-photon imaging to monitor layer 2/3 neuronal activity and ATP usage. I found that food restriction reduced synaptic ATP usage by 29% through a decrease in AMPA receptor conductance. Neuronal excitability was nonetheless preserved by a compensatory increase in input resistance and a depolarized resting membrane potential. Consequently, neurons spiked at similar rates as controls, but spent less ATP on underlying excitatory currents. This energy-saving strategy had a cost since it amplified the variability of visually-evoked subthreshold responses, leading to a 32% broadening in orientation tuning and impaired fine visual discrimination. This reduction in coding precision was associated with reduced levels of the fat mass-regulated hormone leptin and was restored by exogenous leptin supplementation. These findings reveal novel mechanisms that dynamically regulate energy usage and coding precision in neocortex.

Cortical state, defined by the synchrony of population-level neuronal activity, is a key determinant of sensory perception. While many arousal-associated neuromodulators—including norepinephrine (NE)—reduce cortical synchrony, how the cortex resynchronizes following NE signaling remains unknown. Using in vivo two-photon imaging and electrophysiology in mouse visual cortex, we describe a critical role for cortical astrocytes in circuit resynchronization. We characterize astrocytes’ sensitive calcium responses to changes in behavioral arousal and NE, identify that astrocyte signaling precedes increases in cortical synchrony, and demonstrate that astrocyte-specific deletion of Adra1A alters arousal-related cortical synchrony. Our findings demonstrate that astrocytic NE signaling acts as a distinct neuromodulatory pathway, regulating cortical state and linking arousal-associated desynchrony to cortical circuit resynchronization.

Neurons in the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN, the brain’s master circadian clock) display a 24 hour cycle in the their rate of action potential discharge whereby firing rates are high during the light phase and lower during the dark phase. Although it is generally agreed that this cycle of activity is a key mediator of the clock’s neural and humoral output, surprisingly little is known about how changes in clock electrical activity can mediate scheduled physiological changes at different times of day. Using opto- and chemogenetic approaches in mice we have shown that the onset of electrical activity in vasopressin releasing SCN neurons near Zeitgeber time 22 (ZT22) activates glutamatergic thirst-promoting neurons in the OVLT (organum vasculosum lamina terminalis) to promote water intake prior to sleep. This effect is mediated by activity-dependent release of vasopressin from the axon terminals of SCN neurons which acts as a neurotransmitter on OVLT neurons. More recently we found that the clock receives excitatory input from a different subset of sodium sensing neurons in the OVLT. Activation of these neurons by a systemic salt load delivered at ZT19 stimulated the electrical activity of SCN neurons which are normally silent at this time. Remarkably, this effect induced an acute reduction in non-shivering thermogenesis and body temperature, which is an adaptive response to the salt load. These findings provide information regarding the mechanisms by which the SCN promotes scheduled physiological rhythms and indicates that the clock’s output circuitry can also be recruited to mediate an unscheduled homeostatic response.

Oxytocin orchestrates social and emotional behaviors through modulation of neural circuits in brain structures such as the central amygdala (CeA). In this structure, the release of oxytocin modulates inhibitory circuits and subsequently suppresses fear responses and decreases anxiety levels. Using astrocyte-specific gain and loss of function approaches and pharmacology, we demonstrate that oxytocin signaling in the central amygdala relies on a subpopulation of astrocytes that represent a prerequisite for proper function of CeA circuits and adequate behavioral responses, both in rats and mice. Our work identifies astrocytes as crucial cellular intermediaries of oxytocinergic modulation in emotional behaviors related to anxiety or positive reinforcement. To our knowledge, this is the first demonstration of a direct role of astrocytes in oxytocin signaling and challenges the long-held dogma that oxytocin signaling occurs exclusively via direct action on neurons in the central nervous system.

Norepinephrine (NE) is a neuromodulator that is released from projections of the locus coeruleus via extra-synaptic vesicle exocytosis. Tonic fluctuations in NE are involved in brain states, such as sleep, arousal, and attention. Previously, NE in the PFC was thought to be a homogenous field created by bulk release, but it remains unknown whether phasic (fast, short-term) fluctuations in NE can produce a spatially heterogeneous field, which could then structure cell firing at a fine spatial scale. To understand how spatiotemporal dynamics of norepinephrine (NE) release in the prefrontal cortex affect neuronal firing, we performed a novel in-vivo two-photon imaging experiment in layer ⅔ of the prefrontal cortex using a green fluorescent NE sensor and a red fluorescent Ca2+ sensor, which allowed us to simultaneously observe fine-scale neuronal and NE dynamics in the form of spatially localized fluorescence time series. Using generalized linear modeling, we found that the local NE field differs from the global NE field in transient periods of decorrelation, which are influenced by proximal NE release events. We used optical flow and pattern analysis to show that release and reuptake events can occur at the same location but at different times, and differential recruitment of release and reuptake sites over time is a potential mechanism for creating a heterogeneous NE field. Our generalized linear models predicting cellular dynamics show that the heterogeneous local NE field, and not the global field, drives cell firing dynamics. These results point to the importance of local, small-scale, phasic NE fluctuations for structuring cell firing. Prior research suggests that these phasic NE fluctuations in the PFC may play a role in attentional shifts, orienting to sensory stimuli in the environment, and in the selective gain of priority representations during stress (Mather, Clewett et al. 2016) (Aston-Jones and Bloom 1981).

Survival is predicated on the ability of an organism to respond to stress. The reliability of this response is ensured by a synaptic architecture that is relatively inflexible (i.e. hard-wired). Our work has shown that in naive animals, synapses on CRH neurons in the paraventricular nucleus of the hypothalamus are very reluctant to modification. If animals are stressed, however, these synapses become willing to learn. This seminar will focus on mechanisms linking acute stress to metaplastic changes at glutamate synapses, and also show how stress, and these synaptic changes can be transmitted from one individual to another.

Menstruation is a normal physiological process in women occurring as a result of changes in two ovarian produced hormones – estrogen and progesterone. As a result of these fluctuations, women experience different symptoms in their bodies – their immune system changes (Sekigawa et al, 2004), there are changes in their cardiovascular and digestive system (Millikan, 2006), as well as skin (Hall and Phillips, 2005). But these hormone fluctuations produce major changes in their behavioral pattern as well causing: anxiety, sadness, heightened irritability and anger (Severino and Moline, 1995) which is usually classified as premenstrual syndrome (PMS). In some cases these symptoms severely impair women’s lives and professional help is required. The official diagnosis according to DSM-5 (2013) is premenstrual dysphoric disorder (PMDD). Despite its ubiquitous presence the origins of PMS and PMDD are poorly understood. Some efforts to understand the underlying brain state during the menstruation cycle were performed by using TMS (Smith et al, 1999; 2002; 2003; Inghilleri et al, 2004; Hausmann et al, 2006). But all of these experiments suffer from major shortcomings - no control groups and small number of subjects. Our plan is to address all of these shortcomings and make this the biggest (to our knowledge) experiment of its kind which will, hopefully, provide us with some much needed answers.

Sympathetic nerve activation of adrenergic receptors on fat is the major pathway the brain uses to drive non-shivering thermogenesis in brown adipose tissue and lipolysis in white fat. There is accumulating evidence that the peripheral nerve architecture inside of organs is plastic (can be remodeled) but the factors and conditions that regulate or result in remodeling are largely unknown. Particularly for fat, it remains unclear if nerves in fat can be remodeled in step with hyperplasia/trophy of adipose tissue as result of a prolonged energy surfeit. This talk will discuss our recent work identifying the sympathetic nerve architecture in adipose tissue as highly plastic in response to the adipose hormone leptin, the brain circuitry leptin acts on to regulate this and the physiological effects remodeling of innervation has on fat tissue function.

Ascending neuromodulatory projections from the locus coeruleus (LC) affect cortical neural networks via the release of norepinephrine (NE). However, the exact nature of these neuromodulatory effects on neural activity patterns in vivo is not well understood. Here we show that in awake monkeys, LC activation is associated with changes in coordinated activity patterns in the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC). These relationships, which are largely independent of changes in firing rates of individual ACC neurons, depend on the type of LC activation: ACC pairwise correlations tend to be reduced when tonic (baseline) LC activity increases but are enhanced when external events drive phasic LC responses. Both relationships covary with pupil changes that reflect LC activation and arousal. These results suggest that modulations of information processing that reflect changes in coordinated activity patterns in cortical networks can result partly from ongoing, context-dependent, arousal-related changes in activation of the LC-NE system.

The increasing prevalence of obesity and type 2 diabetes (T2D) and associated morbidity and mortality emphasizes the need for a more complete understanding of the mechanisms mediating energy homeostasis to accelerate the identification of new medications. Recent reports indicate that obesity medication, 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT, serotonin)2C receptor (5-HT2CR) agonist lorcaserin improves glycemic control in association with weight loss in obese patients with T2D. We examined whether lorcaserin has a direct effect on insulin sensitivity and how this effect is achieved. We clarify that lorcaserin dose-dependently improves glycemic control in a mouse model of T2D without altering body weight. Examining the mechanism of this effect, we reveal a necessary and sufficient neurochemical mediator of lorcaserin’s glucoregulatory effects, via activation of brain pro-opiomelanocortin (POMC) peptides. We observed that lorcaserin reduces hepatic glucose production and improves insulin sensitivity. These data suggest that lorcaserin’s action within the brain represents a mechanistically novel treatment for T2D: findings of significance to a prevalent global disease.